Environmental Sensitivities
A growing number of people suffer mild to serious health problems from exposures to common everyday chemicals found in our environment, and the even less understood phenomena of electrical sensitivity. These chemicals are found in perfume, cologne, hair products, cosmetics, household cleaners, pesticides, car exhaust, cigarette smoke, many scented products, or air fresheners, to name a few.
Dr. Rea, a leading medical specialist in Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, indicates that it is an environmentally triggered disease acquired either by a one time acute exposure or from low-level long-term exposures. As the number of dangerous environmental pollutants increase, so does the number of people who are sensitive.1
The MCS Fact Sheet states that a person’s body is unable to cleanse its tissues of the chemicals it is exposed to through air, food, water or skin contact. Many systems in the body are affected especially the central nervous, immune, respiratory, musculoskeletal, endocrine, and digestive systems. Symptoms vary and may include headaches, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, exhaustion, respiratory problems, aching joints and muscles, memory and concentration problems, irritated eyes, nose, ears, throat, skin, odour intolerance and sensitivity to bright light, sound and temperature extremes.2
According to The Medical Perspective on Environmental Sensitivities written by Dr. Meg Sears and commissioned by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, approximately 3% of Canadians have been diagnosed with environmental sensitivities and many more are somewhat sensitive to traces of chemical and/or electromagnetic phenomena. Accommodating people with these environmental sensitivities involves many people, employers, co-workers, neighbours, family, friends etc.”Some of the most important accommodations involve behavior changes. These include the use of the least-toxic cleaning and pest control practices and avoidance of scented products.”3
Dr. Sears informs us that once a person has developed sensitivities, “Reactions may occur to a broader range of factors, at levels of exposure that were previously tolerated and that cause little difficulty to many others.”4 She stresses that the importance of early recognition, environmental control, avoidance of symptom-triggering agents, removal of toxins from the body and recovery of normal biological processes are key to regaining and maintaining health for people with sensitivities. However, these sensitivities will be life long.
Public policy, law and regulation are protecting people from some of the triggers like tobacco smoke, pesticides, fragrances and other chemicals in public places. Even the medical community is speaking up for broader policies and laws and recognizing this condition in medical education. No-smoking, scent-free, pesticide-free, no-idling and least-toxic cleaning policies in health care and other public places are increasing.5
It is important to note the Dr. Sears indicates that these environmental sensitivities generally arise from physiological causes. The most practical approach is to minimize potentially harmful exposures to the various triggers both in the workplace and home environment. “The comprehensive biopsychosocial model of medicine, treating the body, mind and environment is therefore the most appropriate and effective framework for treating environmental sensitivities.”6
1 – Rea, William, M.D. (1992) Chemical Sensitivities. CRC Press Inc.
2 – Multiple Chemical Sensitivity –MCS Fact Sheet
3 – Canadian Human Rights Commission Report Accommodating the environmentally sensitive protects everyone, Summer 2007, www.environmentalhealth.ca/summer07humanrights.html
4 – Environmental Sensitivities-Medical Issues Sears 2007
5 – Environmental Sensitivities-Medical Issues Sears 2007
6 – Environmental Sensitivities-Medical Issues Sears 2007
January 18, 2010 - 8:49 am
Your readers should learn about work done by Health Canada prior to 1993 that Meg Sears and the CHRC are helping to invisibilize, even as the people Health Canada was once working to protect are injured or unnecessarily killed in health care. See http://ages.ca/content/submission-parliamentary-standing-committee-health-2005
January 18, 2010 - 8:55 am
You might also want to learn about the 1985 Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Environmental Hypersensitivity Disorders that was commissioned by the Ontario Ministry of Health in 1984, published in 1985. The authors found an existing publicly insured method of diagnosis about which various health ministries and others are not being forthright.
Sears was a newcomer who did not listen consumers, and did not learn about the history of sensitivities before helping managers at the CHRC cover up mistakes they made during the Chretien years concerning work the CHRC and Health Canada (and CMHC and Treasury Board and Public Works and SecState) did in the early 1990s.
More than 70,000 Canadians with sensitivities have been unnecessarily killed by adverse drug reactions since the protections Health Canada was encouraging prior to 1993 were abandoned. This is a significant portion of those who were killed by adverse drug events during the same period. Source of figures is below chart at http://ages.ca/deaths
January 18, 2010 - 8:57 am
The Ontario report and its appendices, and a 2001 letter commenting on it by its principal author, are available as attachments at http://ages.ca/content/report-ad-hoc-committee-environmental-hypersensitivity-disorders-wappendices
The letter is important because it clarifies the fact that the report identified a (legally obligating) publicly insured method of diagnosis in 1985.
January 18, 2010 - 8:59 am
Also, the prevalence of sensitivities is thought to be much higher than reported by neophyte Meg Sears. Check out Caress and Steinemann, or the US National Academy of Sciences.
January 18, 2010 - 4:47 pm
For instance, as one can see in the attachment on this page, the CHRC was promoting the rights of persons with sensitivities long before current CHRC managers started rewriting history, abusing Meg Sear’s ignorance to do so. The CHRC wass promoting the rights of persons with sensitivities in 1991.
http://ages.ca/content/chrc-stuart-beaty-brown-about-promoting-rights-persons-sensitivities
More than 70,000 Canadians with sensitivities have been unnecessarily killed in health care since these efforts were abandoned in 1993.
May 16, 2011 - 3:40 pm
The 2010 housing report of the US National Council on Disability pegs the prevalence of persons who have special housing needs as a result of sensitivities at 11%. Their report is available at http://ages.ca/content/state-housing-america-21st-century-disability-perspective
January 16, 2012 - 8:56 am
I cannot thank you adequately for the blogposts on your site. I know you put a lot of time and energy into them and hope you know how deeply I enjoy it. I hope I am able to do a similar thing for another individual at some point.
February 2, 2012 - 1:06 pm
This is such a fantastic resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing web sites that understand the value of delivering a good quality resource for free. It is the old what goes around comes around routine. Did you acquired many links and also I see numerous trackbacks??
March 7, 2012 - 10:26 am
cool post thanks!http://www.bobesponjajogos.org
March 8, 2012 - 4:38 am
keep doing a good work please.http://www.descontoaocubo.net
March 22, 2012 - 6:10 am
this is amazing!http://www.gustavolima.org